KUBR

Tyco's CEO and CFO looted the company through unapproved bonuses and loans

Tyco International · Industrial conglomerate (listed)

Related-party diversionGovernance failureConcealed debt

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Governance signals

    Would have tested whether executive loans and bonuses had board approval.

    Can mislead when: Private companies file late, so these signals are lagging. Kubr uses them to support other flags, not to prove anything alone.

    2

    End-use tracing of funds

    Would have traced company payments to executives' personal purchases.

    Can mislead when: Kubr sees only the company's own accounts. Once money reaches a third party's bank, Kubr can flag the payee but cannot see the next hop without that party's consent.

    3

    Ownership / related-party links

    Would have mapped payments to executives and their related parties.

    Can mislead when: Nominee directors and offshore layers hide links. Name matching throws up false positives, so every flag shows its evidence path.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Borrower monitor

    Offered in India
    • C3 Would have mapped payments to executives and their related parties.
    • C6 Would have traced company payments to executives' personal purchases.
    • C11 Would have tested whether executive loans and bonuses had board approval.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C3 Would have mapped payments to executives and their related parties.
    • C11 Would have tested whether executive loans and bonuses had board approval.

    Legal diligence support

    Offered in India
    • C3 Would have mapped payments to executives and their related parties.
    • C11 Would have tested whether executive loans and bonuses had board approval.

    Promoter profiles

    Offered in India
    • C3 Would have mapped payments to executives and their related parties.
    • C11 Would have tested whether executive loans and bonuses had board approval.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.