KUBR

Do Kwon sentenced to 15 years; Terraform liable for US$4.5bn to SEC

Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd. (Do Kwon) · Crypto stablecoin issuer

Regulatory breachFunding shock

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Document authenticity / direct pull

    Would have tested the payments claim against on-chain transaction data.

    Can mislead when: The company can refuse consent, and a refusal is itself a flag. Some banks and co-op banks are not on AA yet.

    2

    Third-party confirmation

    Would have asked the named payment partner how its transactions were processed.

    Can mislead when: Counterparties can collude or ignore requests. A non-response is logged as a gap, never as a pass.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • Peer multiples and the exit-multiple bridge would have shown how much of the story relied on valuation holding.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C5 Would have tested the payments claim against on-chain transaction data.

    IC note

    Offered in India
    • C5 Would have tested the payments claim against on-chain transaction data.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.