KUBR

Livedoor founder convicted of false reporting of a JPY 5 billion profit

Livedoor Co Ltd · Internet portal

Revenue inflationFake customers or vendorsRound-tripping

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Ownership / related-party links

    Would have linked the funds and counterparties to company insiders.

    Can mislead when: Nominee directors and offshore layers hide links. Name matching throws up false positives, so every flag shows its evidence path.

    2

    Bank credits vs books

    Would have tested reported profit against cash receipts.

    Can mislead when: AA only sees the accounts the company links, so an undisclosed account stays invisible. Cash-heavy businesses and timing differences create false flags.

    3

    Avoidance transactions

    Would have identified circular deals with affiliated funds.

    Can mislead when: Only the tribunal decides what counts as an avoidance transaction. Kubr flags candidates and never states a conclusion.

    4

    Regulatory & litigation records

    Would have tracked regulatory inquiries.

    Can mislead when: Court records lag and name spellings vary. A clean record can mean the problem has not reached court yet.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have tracked regulatory inquiries.

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have tested reported profit against cash receipts.
    • C3 Would have linked the funds and counterparties to company insiders.
    • C8 Would have tracked regulatory inquiries.

    Borrower monitor

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have tested reported profit against cash receipts.
    • C3 Would have linked the funds and counterparties to company insiders.
    • C8 Would have tracked regulatory inquiries.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C3 Would have linked the funds and counterparties to company insiders.
    • C8 Would have tracked regulatory inquiries.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.