Director disqualified after £1.6bn collapse; misappropriated Credit Suisse funds
Greensill Capital Limited · Financial Services / Fintech Lending
The case in brief
Visible before detection
Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight
Ownership / related-party links
GFG Alliance concentration and related-party exposure would have revealed extreme counterparty risk
Can mislead when: Nominee directors and offshore layers hide links. Name matching throws up false positives, so every flag shows its evidence path.
End-use tracing of funds
Fund diversions from Credit Suisse investment to unauthorized purposes
Can mislead when: Kubr sees only the company's own accounts. Once money reaches a third party's bank, Kubr can flag the payee but cannot see the next hop without that party's consent.
Where Kubr services would have helped
Borrower monitor
Offered in India- C3 GFG Alliance concentration and related-party exposure would have revealed extreme counterparty risk
- C6 Fund diversions from Credit Suisse investment to unauthorized purposes
Proceeds tracer
Offered in India- C3 GFG Alliance concentration and related-party exposure would have revealed extreme counterparty risk
- C6 Fund diversions from Credit Suisse investment to unauthorized purposes
Verified Snapshot
Offered in India- C3 GFG Alliance concentration and related-party exposure would have revealed extreme counterparty risk
Financial diligence
Offered in India- C3 GFG Alliance concentration and related-party exposure would have revealed extreme counterparty risk
Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.
Same pattern
A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.